Opinion: Why the PGCB Ban on Four Individuals for Leaving Children unattended while gambling is A Justified Ban
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board recently banned four individuals from casinos in the state after they left their children unattended in vehicles while they were gambling inside the casino. The decision has led to some discussion regarding the PGCB overstepping its bounds. However, in this gambler’s opinion, the PGCB ‘s decision to ban these individuals is a justified ban, necessary to protect the safety and well-being of children.
Leaving Children Unattended in Vehicles is a Serious Offense
Starting with the basic of basics: leaving children unattended in vehicles is a serious offense that can result in mental and physical harm to the child. According to state law – anyone who leaves a child in an unattended vehicle is facing a misdemeanor. The PGCB ‘s decision to ban these individuals from casinos is just a logical extension of this law. By allowing these individuals to continue gambling, the PGCB would be condoning their irresponsible behavior and potentially putting more children at risk.
The PGCB Has a Responsibility to Regulate Casino Gambling and Maintain its Reputation
Furthermore, the PGCB has a responsibility to regulate casino gambling in the state and maintain its reputation as a safe and responsible activity. Allowing individuals who have shown a blatant disregard for the safety of their children to continue gambling undermines this reputation and could lead to increased scrutiny and criticism of the industry. By taking a strong stance against this behavior, the PGCB is sending a message that irresponsible gambling behavior will not be tolerated.
The PGCB’s Decision to Ban These Individuals is Not an Infringement on Their Rights
This message is easily understood when realizing that the PGCB’s decision to ban these individuals is not due to an isolated incident. Gambles who neglect their kids for a short hour have become a widespread problem in recent years that needs to be addressed, and the PGCB’s decision to ban these individuals is a step in the right direction and a clear message for gamblers to be accountable for their actions. On top of the ban the PGCB also initiated a “Don’t gamble with kids” campaign to emphasize that message and to prove their commitment to the community well being.
As mentioned above, leaving children unattended can also lead to long-lasting psychological effects. This type of neglect can lead to feelings of abandonment, trauma and might affect development and future relationships neglected children. By banning these individuals from casinos, the PGCB is taking a proactive step to protect the well-being of these children and are showing how serious they are about it.
The PGCB’s Decision to Ban These Individuals is Necessary and Justified
Finally, the PGCB’s decision to ban these individuals is not an infringement on their rights. The PGCB has the authority to regulate casino gambling in the state and to impose penalties on individuals who engage in irresponsible behavior. By leaving their children unattended in vehicles, these individuals have shown that they are not responsible gamblers and do not deserve the privilege of gambling in the state’s casinos. In conclusion, The PGCB’s strong stance against this behavior sends a message that they will not tolerate irresponsible gambling. as a father and a pro-bettor, I feel that even a harsher stance should have been taken to make sure irresponsible gambling behavior will not be tolerated, and the safety and well-being of children is above all else.